Sunday, December 11, 2011

Reconfigurations of the 1 v 99

On October 28, a number of people including Natives and their allies put forward a Memorandum of Solidarity with Indigenous Peoples to the Occupy Oakland General Assembly. The Memorandum passed by a ninety-seven percent majority. On December 4, four Native women submitted a proposal to the Occupy Oakland General Assembly to change the name of “Occupy Oakland” to “Decolonize/Liberate Oakland.” Sixty-eight percent supported the proposal; thirty-two percent did not (by voting no or abstaining). Concurrently, the People of Color (POC) Caucus, and a subgroup of the caucus called Queer People of Color, has been discussing the possibilities of autonomously organizing their efforts apart from Occupy Oakland. These discussions have focused on intensifying concerns within OO about the continued privileging of the norms and voices of heterosexual men and whites (not necessary mutually exclusive groups) despite the self-presentations of Occupy movements as consensual and leaderless. They are discussions echoed throughout the country in multiple kinds of proposals, solidarity statements, caucus formations, and withdrawals.

Within the context of but autonomously organized from Occupy Portland is Unsettle Portland (http://unsettleportland.org). “Why “Unsettle”? All this land was settled 150 years ago: taken by force from the people that had generations of relationship with it. The law was used as a screen to mask this raw injustice. Every real estate deed in this country is clouded by blood and betrayal. Over the last few years, the banks of the 1% have instituted a new kind of “settlement”: using predatory lending, subprime derivatives, and corrupt politicians to steal trillions of dollars of assets from working people. And now those houses and buildings are standing vacant, decaying amid a sea of need, under cover of the “law”. We unsettle the banks to create the conditions for a new relation with the land, a foundation from which to decolonize all our lives.” Acknowledging the real historical connections between the fraudulent and violent history of Native land dispossession and “predatory lending, subprime derivatives, and corrupt politicians,” Unsettle Portland focuses its efforts on supporting families resisting eviction, and those planning on re-inhabiting foreclosed homes and other vacant buildings.  We support community control of land and housing, and are an affiliate of Take Back The Land.

In Albuquerque, a number of Native and allied protesters within Occupy have renamed their actions (Un)Occupy Albuquerque. As they explain: ““For many indigenous people, the term ‘Occupy’ is deeply problematic. For New Mexico’s indigenous people, ‘Occupy’ means five-hundred years of forced occupation of their lands, resources, cultures, power, and voices by the imperial powers of both Spain and the United States. A big chunk of the 99 percent has been served pretty well by that arrangement. A smaller chunk hasn’t.” That “smaller chunk” includes the 1.8% of the U.S. population who are Native, including American Indians, Alaskan Natives, Native Hawaiians, and indigenous peoples of U.S territories in the Pacific, Caribbean, and Central America who continue to live at a 25% plus poverty rate compared to non-Natives and with all commensurate experiences of disproportionate numbers of land loss, unemployment, housing shortages, and ill health from malnutrition and environmental contamination.

Meanwhile, in Denver, the Anarchists’ collective has decided to no longer offer its legal support to OD:

“Our decision is based on festering frustrations with a small sector of OD who continue to marginalize, silence, and threaten our communities and ally communities. Despite the hard work of many involved in OD, its political platform continues to be framed by and for economically privileged, hyper-nationalist white heterosexual males. Experiences of race, gender, class, nationality, immigration status, and a multitude of other identities continue to be buried underneath the dominant “We are the 99%” narrative.”

The 99% Narrative

If you only listened to left-leaning commentators on network and cable news, the 99% sound like an amazingly populist, unified majority standing righteously against the corruption and greed of the 1%. The 99% are represented as embodying the best hope of leftist principles for social change that not merely “redistributes” existing wealth and privilege but overhauls the entire capitalist system.

Take Michael Moore’s recent blog entry: “We are not even 12 weeks old, yet Occupy Wall Street has grown so fast, so big, none of us can keep up with the hundreds of towns who have joined the movement, or the thousands of actions -- some of them just simple ones in neighborhoods, schools and organizations -- that have happened. The national conversation has been irreversibly changed. Now everyone is talking about how the 1% are getting away with all the money while the 99% struggle to make ends meet. People are no longer paralyzed by despair or apathy. Most know that now is the time to reclaim our country from the bankers, the lobbyists -- and their gofers: the members of the United States Congress and the 50 state legislatures….”

Even Cornell West, in an interview with Amy Goodman, has heralded Occupy as a democratic revolution fulfilling the vision of Martin Luther King: “Well, I think we’ve got to keep the momentum going, because it’s impossible to translate the issue of the greed of Wall Street into one demand or two demands. We’re talking about a democratic awakening. You’re talking about raising political consciousness so it spills over all parts of the country, so people can begin to see what’s going on through a different set of lens. And then you begin to highlight what the more detailed demands would be, because in the end we’re really talking about what Martin King would call a revolution: a transfer of power from oligarchs to everyday people of all colors. And that is a step-by-step process. It’s a democratic process. It’s a non-violent process. But it is a revolution, because these oligarchs have been transferring wealth from poor and working people at a very intense rate in the last 30 years and getting away with it, and then still smiling in our faces and telling us it’s our fault. That’s a lie. And this beautiful group is a testimony to that being a lie, when you get the makings of a U.S. autumn responding to the Arab Spring. And it’s growing and growing. I hope it spills over to San Francisco and Chicago and Miami and Phoenix, Arizona, with our brown brothers and sisters, hits our poor white brothers and sisters in Appalachia, so it begins to coalesce. And I tell you, it is—it’s sublime to see all the different colors, all the different genders, all the different sexual orientations and different cultures, all together here in Liberty Plaza. There’s no doubt about it.”

All together? Really?

The Challenge

Some within OO have accused Native/Indigenous, queer, women, and others of being divisive and trying to co-opt the movement for their own ends in their criticisms of heterosexual, white, male privileges in the GA process and leadership structure of OO.


If places like Occupy Oakland cannot figure out how to better reflect the concerns and experiences of Native/Indigenous, queer, women and other people (not that these are mutually exclusive), people and their communities will become autonomously organized. It is already happening through the renaming, reforming, and reshaping of caucuses and committees who are feeling marginalized and dismissed. It is already happening by groups moving meetings away from Oscar Grant Plaza. It is already happening as groups reimagine how to make other spaces where their perspectives and experiences are honored and respected. It is already happening.




Thursday, December 1, 2011

Names, Websites, and a Tipi

This has been a difficult week for Native and Indigenous people and their allies in the #OO movement.

Brief context... Names.

The Queer People of Color/People of Color (Q/POC) Caucus has been discussing a proposal by several Native/Indigenous people to change the name of OO to Decolonize/Liberate Oakland. As of today, they have not reached consensus on the text of the proposal or, more to the point, on its intent. Concerns have congealed around questions about the larger goals of #OO/#OWS, whether or not those goals speak to the histories and realities of colonialism, imperialism, and racism, and what kinds of actions would characterize a decolonial movement. Several have expressed concerns about the way a name change would suggest a breaking apart from the international #OWS movement.

Concurrently, a number of Native and Indigenous people and their allies -- at the time, none of whom had been actively involved in the Q/POC -- put forth a Memorandum of Solidarity with Indigenous Peoples to the General Assembly. The Memorandum passed by a 97% vote on October 28. It was based on the text of a statement passed by Occupy Boston immediately before Indigenous Peoples Day. It paralleled actions at Occupy Albuquerque, when a group of Native/Indigenous activists named their protests (Un)Occupy Albuquerque, and at Occupy Portland, where a group changed their name to Unsettle Portland. These name changes were done to acknowledge the roots of colonialism and imperialism within capitalism as well as its consequences for the original inhabitants of these lands.

In Oakland, the tenth annual Sacred Site/Shellmound Peace Walk took place. Sponsored by Indian People Organzing for Change, the walk intends "to join in a journey of walk and prayer to remember our ancestors that lived on this land for thousands of years. We will walk and pray with our ancestors in areas where shellmounds and sacred sites have been desecrated by development." The Bay Street Mall -- renamed the Dead Mall by IPOC -- is in Emeryville. It was built over a deplorably contaminated Chochenyo Ohlone shellmound site. During the construction of the mall, many ancestors were left in the ground and are now under stores and parking lots, while over 500 ancestors were dumped into a mass grave in an unknown location. The Dead Mall serves as the place of the last day of a month of protest and public education about Ohlone people and struggles for sacred site protection in the bay area (watch the short documentary "Shellmound" to learn more).

Two days before the Emeryville action on Black Friday, November 25, the General Assembly approved a solidarity statement. Many OO people attended and stood with IPOC in their efforts.
And then... Websites.
Corrina Gould (Chochenyo Ohlone), Morning Star Gali (Pit River), Krea Gomez, and Anita DeAsis -- some of whom had attended Q/POC meetings -- put forth their own proposal to change the name of OO to Decolonize Oakland. They forwarded the proposal to the facilitation team, who was supposed to post it and put it on the GA agenda. This did not happen.
Meanwhile, a Palestinian man who has been active in #OO efforts and serves on the Media Committee, posted a long comment on the #OO Open Forum's page denouncing the proposal. This post set off a flurry of similar postings on OO sites -- including Facebook and twitter.
Corrina, Morning Star, Krea, and Anita decided to table the proposal for a week. They resubmitted it to the facilitation team, who posted it on-line and put it on the GA agenda. It will be presented to the GA on Sunday, December 4.
And a Tipi....
A Blackfoot man, probably most well-known in bay area politics for protesting UCB's destruction of an Oak Grove over an Ohlone burial site to expand one of its sports facilities, announced that he was going to put up a tipi at Oscar Grant Plaza. The announcement made it quickly onto the OO website and independent news forums, stating:

"A teepee will remind the public of the former Occupy camp (pictured in its former condition; now a swamp--thanks to Quan) and historic struggles of the Sioux Indians on the Plains of the U.S., homeless workers in Hoovervilles during the Great Depression, the "Bonus March" in Washington D.C. by unpaid and unemployed veterans in 1932, Resurrection City following the assassination of Martin Luther King, the AIDS vigil of 1980s San Francisco, and the redwood occupations of Judi Bari and Running Wolf."

Individuals within OO and OSF rallied support for the tipi, claiming it as an act of civil disobedience that embodied the best principles of the #OWS movement to reclaim public spaces for public use.
Expectations
Swirling, whirling tides of frustration, anger, withdrawal, disrespect....
The deep potential of the #OWS movement to initiate radical social change has been met in Oakland with the harsh realities of U.S. colonialism, imperialism, and racism on "the left."
These harsh realities include those in privileged positions of power not being held to account and not being transparent in their actions. As with the individual who posted comments on the OO Open Forum about a proposal that had not yet been made public. However he was able to get a copy of the proposal ahead of time, he worked hard to thwart and undermine the process of its presentation and reception.
These harsh realities also include those in privileged positions -- such as civil rights attorneys and left activists of the bay area -- wanting to use Native and Indigenous people as symbols to legitimate their political radicalness and inclusivity ('cause tipis are cool) without having to change their historical understanding or acknowledgement of their role in Native and Indigenous oppression.
As has been observed by many Native and Indigenous people in the bay area on the occasion of the tipi being put up at Oscar Grant Plaza: This was an action of an individual Blackfoot man, apparently encouraged by an OSF/OO "working group" of civil rights attorneys. It was not done in consultation with Chochenyo Ohlone people (on whose lands Oakland rests) nor with Native/Indigenous people involved in #OO. It is, of course, his right to do so but #OO and the media should not represent it as being representative.
Glomming onto the tipi as a symbol of solidarity with Native/Indigenous peoples is problematic in several directions, including the basic historical fact that the Ohlone did not use tipis and the Lakota are not indigenous to Oakland. Its appropriation by #OO and the left as an emblem of solidarity is confused and insulting to many Native/Indigenous people.
And Still.
Just when frustration seems to peak, several of us are reminded by Native/Indigenous grandmothers who have come forward in #OO that the ancestors want us to be calm and patient, to remember the deeper goals and work of restoration and reconciliation. To honor the ancestors is to defer to their teachings. To regroup and remember why we are here.
I am still trying to figure this out, but it seems to me that "decolonization" -- with all of its convoluted legal, political, and social implications -- is most important in relation to our minds and our relationships. We must work hard to stay the course of solidarity work but we must also work hard at re-educating ourselves and respecting one another.
Difficult, to be sure, when confronting not only a capitalist-legal system built on our dehumanization and exploitation but individuals within the #OO/#OWS movement who have misused their positions of privilege and authority to undermine, belittle, or appropriate us and our cultures.
Further reading and listening: